Tag Archives: Syria’

Campaign in Syria to beat IS will be ‘long, challenging and costly’: Abbott

Updated December ten, 2015 05:52:11

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has warned the West’s campaign in Syria will be “long, difficult and pricey”, and has referred to as for the “correct intervention” to ultimately defeat the Islamic State (IS) terrorist group.

In a speech to the International Institute for Strategic Research Asia in Singapore overnight, Mr Abbott acknowledged past interventions in Iraq and Libya had ended badly.

But he argued the decision not to intervene in Syria sooner had been even a lot more disastrous.

“A quarter of a million dead 7 million internally displaced and 4 million in camps beyond the borders pondering of coming to Europe whilst Islamic State posts, on the web, for the globe to see, ever more barbaric techniques to kill folks,” he told the audience.

Mr Abbott stated the “appropriate intervention” was needed in Syria or the threat to the world’s peace and prosperity would only get worse, but he conceded that locating a strategy was the challenge.

Because losing the prime ministership in September, Mr Abbott has used a series of public lectures to argue for the West to step up its military commitment in Syria, arguing air strikes alone would not defeat IS.

On Wednesday night, he emphasised the need for leadership from the outside and welcomed the United States’ decision to send a lot more special forces troops into the nation, saying it was a sign the nation was “finally edging towards the action necessary to win this war”.

Mr Abbott once more raised the prospect of Western troops fighting alongside local forces in Syria or even the establishment of secure-havens protected by no-fly zones.

“It will be a long, hard and costly engagement, fairly possibly the job of decades not years,” he mentioned.

“But ahead of we shrink from such a prospect we must keep in mind how much the world has gained from the US and its allies’ sustained, post-war willingness to stand up for universal values as properly as for their own interests.”

The speech was delivered on the identical day the former prime minister called for a “religious revolution” inside Islam, declaring “cultures are not all equal”.

“We’ve got to work closely with reside-and-let-live Muslims since there wants to be, as president [Abdel Fattah] Al-Sisi of Egypt has mentioned, a religious revolution inside Islam,” Mr Abbott stated.

“All of those items that Islam has never had — a reformation, an enlightenment, a well-created idea of the separation of church and state — that demands to occur.”

His comments drew criticism from the Muslim community in Australia as properly as the Federal Opposition, which named on Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to pull his predecessor into line.

Subjects: terrorism, unrest-conflict-and-war, government-and-politics, world-politics, abbott-tony, singapore, australia

First posted December 09, 2015 23:36:05

Agen Sabung Ayam

Campaign in Syria to beat IS will be ‘long, tough and costly’: Abbott

Posted December 09, 2015 23:36:05

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has warned the West’s campaign in Syria will be “long, tough and expensive”, and has named for the “right intervention” to in the end defeat the Islamic State (IS) terrorist group.

In a speech to the International Institute for Strategic Studies Asia in Singapore overnight, Mr Abbott acknowledged past interventions in Iraq and Libya had ended badly.

But he argued the choice not to intervene in Syria sooner had been even much more disastrous.

“A quarter of a million dead seven million internally displaced and four million in camps beyond the borders considering of coming to Europe although Islamic State posts, on the internet, for the globe to see, ever far more barbaric approaches to kill individuals,” he told the audience.

Mr Abbott said the “correct intervention” was needed in Syria or the threat to the world’s peace and prosperity would only get worse, but he conceded that discovering a strategy was the challenge.

Because losing the prime minister-ship in September, Mr Abbott has used a series of public lectures to argue for the West to step up its military commitment in Syria, arguing air strikes alone would not defeat IS.

Wednesday evening he emphasised the want for leadership from the outdoors and welcomed the United States’ decision to send a lot more particular forces troops into the country, saying it was a sign the country was “lastly edging towards the action required to win this war”.

Mr Abbott once more raised the prospect of Western troops fighting alongside regional forces in Syria or even the establishment of secure-havens protected by no-fly zones.

“It will be a extended, challenging and costly engagement, quite possibly the task of decades not years,” he stated.

“But ahead of we shrink from such a prospect we ought to don’t forget how a lot the globe has gained from the US and its allies’ sustained, post-war willingness to stand up for universal values as properly as for their own interests.”

The speech was delivered on the very same day the former prime minister called for a “religious revolution” within Islam, declaring “cultures are not all equal”.

“We’ve got to operate closely with reside-and-let-live Muslims simply because there needs to be, as president [Abdel Fattah] Al-Sisi of Egypt has mentioned, a religious revolution inside Islam,” Mr Abbott mentioned.

“All of those factors that Islam has never ever had — a Reformation, an Enlightenment, a nicely-developed idea of the separation of church and state — that wants to take place.”

His comments drew criticism from the Muslim neighborhood in Australia as nicely as the Federal Opposition, which referred to as on Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to pull his predecessor into line.

Subjects: terrorism, unrest-conflict-and-war, government-and-politics, planet-politics, abbott-tony, singapore, australia

Agen Sabung Ayam

US aiming for New York meeting on Syria subsequent week

Posted December 09, 2015 08:16:59

Nations involved in the Syrian peace process are set to meet in New York on December 18, but the talks might hinge on efforts to unite Syrian opposition groups in the coming days, US secretary of state John Kerry says.

Russia, the United States, European and Middle Eastern countries agreed last month on a two-year timeline leading to Syrian national elections, but left a lot of queries unresolved, most notably the fate of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

The nations involved in the talks, which also consist of Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey, laid out a strategy such as formal talks in between the government and opposition from January 1.

To obtain that timeline, Saudi Arabia is hosting a conference this week to try to unite Syria’s divided rebel and opposition groups, who are trying to forge a typical platform to be able to negotiate with the Syrian government.

“Depending on the outcome of both the Saudi-led conference of the opposition that is taking place in the next days, as nicely as a handful of other issues, it is our plan to try … [to] have a meeting in New York on December 18,” Mr Kerry stated.

“But again, it depends on the flow of events over the subsequent week.”

A essential concern for a ceasefire will be figuring out which groups fighting Mr Assad will be branded moderate opposition fighters deserving of a seat at the negotiating table and which will be labelled terrorists.

Opposition groups deemed reputable will be invited to take part in the ceasefire although these labelled terrorists, so far Islamic State and al-Qaeda-linked groups, will be treated as fair game for Syrian government forces, Russia, the United States, France and other individuals conducting air strikes in Syria.

“It is totally necessary that as was agreed in Vienna, there should be a nationwide ceasefire as soon as feasible,” UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said.

“In New York I hope we will have a firm and strong basis so that the ceasefire can be launched as well as the political procedure.”

Rebels, opposition seek widespread ground

Syria’s rebel and opposition groups are trying to forge a frequent stance over negotiations to finish the civil war, but the absence of some prominent activists and a major Kurdish force from their meeting in Riyadh shows that unity remains elusive.

Bringing the fragmented opposition together is observed by its backers as a essential step to finish a civil war which began with protests against Bashar al-Assad in 2011 and speedily drew in rival Sunni and Shi’ite Muslim powers across the Middle East.

Shi’ite Iran, Mr Assad’s primary regional supporter, has criticised the meeting in the Sunni Muslim kingdom, saying it is developed to harm efforts to attain a peaceful answer to a war which has killed 250,000 men and women and displaced 12 million.

At a Riyadh hotel exactly where the opposition meeting will start off on Wednesday, safety was stepped up and journalists were ejected as fighters and opposition leaders gathered.

Particular forces soldiers with physique armour and assault rifles manned checkpoints.

An initial list of 65 invitees to the Riyadh talks has grown substantially, but critics say it nonetheless falls brief of a completely inclusive meeting.

The Kurdish administration that runs swathes of north Syria was not invited.

Rebels in western Syria do not trust the main Kurdish militia, the YPG, since they say it cooperates with Damascus rather than fighting it.


Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, globe-politics, syrian-arab-republic, united-states, iran-islamic-republic-of, saudi-arabia, france

Agen Sabung Ayam

Assad says Britain’s Syria strikes ‘illegal’, will only encourage terror

Updated December 07, 2015 01:11:55

Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad has described British air strikes against Islamic State in Syria as “illegal” and says it will only result in “terrorism” to spread.

British MPs voted on final week to join the US-led bombing campaign over Syria.

In an interview with UK media, Mr Assad contrasted Britain’s strategy with Russia, which has the backing of the Syrian government.

“It will be harmful and illegal and it will assistance terrorism as happened after the coalition began its operation a year or so [ago],” he told The Sunday Instances.

Terror, he mentioned, was like a cancer which required to be tackled with a “extensive” strategy which would involve operating with troops on the ground.

“You can not cut out element of the cancer. You have to extract it. This type of operation is like cutting out component of the cancer. That will make it spread in the physique faster,” he said.

“You cannot defeat [IS] by way of air strikes alone. You can not defeat them without cooperation with forces on the ground. You cannot defeat them if you do not have acquire-in from the common public and the government.

“They are going to fail once again.”

Britain began its bombing campaign early on Thursday, hitting an oil field held by IS just hours following a decisive parliamentary vote authorised air strikes.

Momentum to join the air campaign grew soon after IS militants claimed a deadly series of attacks on Paris final month which killed 130 men and women and wounded far more than 350.

In late September, Russia started its personal bombing campaign in Syria in help of Mr Assad, more than a year following a US-led coalition started its strikes targeting the IS group.

Russia is coordinating its air strikes with Damascus, in contrast to the US-led coalition, whose action has been criticised by Mr Assad and his government as ineffectual.

Far more than 250,000 people have been killed since the Syrian conflict erupted in March 2011 with protests against Mr Assad’s regime.


Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, government-and-politics, syrian-arab-republic

Very first posted December 07, 2015 00:55:29

Agen Sabung Ayam

Cameron urges UK parliament to back bombing of IS in Syria

Posted December 03, 2015 00:18:ten

British prime minister David Cameron has urged parliament to vote to approve air strikes against Islamic State (IS) militants in Syria following months of wrangling more than whether or not adequate opposition Labour lawmakers would back military action.

“The threat is extremely actual,” he said at the start of a 10-hour debate due to culminate in a vote later on Wednesday.

“The query is this — do we operate with our allies to degrade and destroy this threat and do we go right after these terrorists in their heartlands from where they are plotting to kill British men and women, or do we sit back and wait for them?”

However, Mr Cameron faced a possible stiffening of opposition in Labour ranks right after media reports he urged his Conservative Celebration lawmakers at a private meeting late on Tuesday not to vote with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn “and a bunch of terrorist sympathisers”.

“This is a contemptible and desperate slur which demeans his office,” Mr Corbyn’s spokesman said, calling for an apology from Mr Cameron.

A spokeswoman for Mr Cameron’s Downing Street workplace did not supply an official comment.

In a additional sign of rising passions over the affair, Labour deputies backing air strikes have turn out to be targets of biting social media attacks by difficult-left activists.

Mr Cameron said he believes British warplanes, which have been bombing Islamic State targets in Iraq for much more than a year, need to also be tackling the group in Syria rather than “sub-contract” national security to other countries.

The November 13 IS attacks that killed 130 individuals in Paris gave momentum to Mr Cameron’s push for air strikes, but critics have questioned whether the action would significantly add to international efforts to defeat the group.

Keen to avoid a repeat of a humiliating 2013 parliamentary defeat more than plans to bomb the forces of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, Mr Cameron had created it clear he would not bring a vote to parliament if he did not believe he could win it.

That appeared far more likely soon after Mr Corbyn, a veteran anti-war campaigner who says strikes would be ineffective and kill civilians, stated he would enable his lawmakers to vote according to their conscience rather than directing them to comply with his lead.


Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, government-and-politics, united-kingdom, syrian-arab-republic

Agen Sabung Ayam

Germany to join military campaign against Islamic State group in Syria

Posted December 02, 2015 00:02:45

Germany’s cabinet has authorized plans for the nation to join the military campaign against the Islamic State (IS) group in Syria, a large step for the nation which has extended resisted a direct part in the conflict.

Essential points

  • Germany will join military campaign against Islamic State group in Syria, but won’t participate in air strikes
  • Choice is a massive step for the country, which has lengthy resisted a direct role in the conflict
  • David Cameron announces Residence of Commons will vote on Britain joining military action in Syria
  • Opposition MPs in Germany raise concerns about ‘combustible’ deployment

In response to an appeal from France right after the November attacks in Paris, chancellor Angela Merkel’s government agreed to send Tornado reconnaissance jets, refuelling aircraft, a frigate to protect a French aircraft carrier, and up to 1,200 soldiers to the region.

Germany will not join France, the United States, Australia and Russia in conducting air strikes in Syria, but the move is considerable provided the country’s post-war history of avoiding foreign military entanglements and voter misgivings about acquiring involved in the conflict in the Middle East.

A letter from the foreign and defence ministries said the deployment was aimed at preventing “terrorist acts” by IS and supporting France and other partners in their fight against the Islamic extremist group, which has taken big swathes of territory in Syria and Iraq.

The announcement came as British prime minister David Cameron announced that the Residence of Commons would vote on military action in Syria.

“The cabinet has accepted my recommendation to have a vote in the Commons tomorrow on military action in Syria as element of a wider technique,” Mr Cameron mentioned on Twitter.

German defence minister Ursula von der Leyen sought to reassure voters, saying that Germany had not been drawn into war against its will but taken a conscious choice to get involved.

She also created clear that there would be no cooperation between German forces and Syrian president Bashar al-Assad or his troops.

“The top line is there will be no cooperation with Assad, and no cooperation with troops below his command,” she stated, though she did not rule out including supporters of Mr Assad in a lengthy-term solution for the country.

“We should keep away from the collapse of the state of Syria.”

Opposition raises concern about ‘combustible’ deployment

The Bundestag decrease property of parliament will debate the concern on Wednesday and a vote is expected later in the week.

The motion looks set to pass offered the broad majority held by Ms Merkel’s “grand coalition” of conservatives and Social Democrats.

Lawmakers from the pacifist Left celebration have warned that the government is raising the risks of an attack on German soil by joining the mission.

They have promised to vote against it and challenge the deployment in court.

Some members of the opposition Greens also have reservations.

“This deployment is combustible and politically and militarily wrong. Showing solidarity with France can’t mean undertaking some thing that is incorrect,” Greens politician Hans-Christian Stroebele mentioned, adding he feared a lot more civilian victims.

German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a Social Democrat, told Bild everyday that patience was necessary and, pointing to the ongoing talks in Vienna, stressed that a political approach for Syria’s long-term future was vital.

“Bombs and rockets alone will not conquer terror, that will only occur although politics,” he told Bild.


Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, world-politics, foreign-affairs, germany, syrian-arab-republic

Agen Sabung Ayam

Men should remain in Syria, Iraq to fight Islamic State: Liberal backbencher

Posted December 01, 2015 14:01:31

A former Abbott government frontbencher has criticised male asylum seekers who seek refuge overseas instead of fighting for their homeland.

Liberal backbencher Bob Baldwin told Parliament last evening that it was “a bit wealthy” to expect coalition soldiers to fight in nations such as Syria and Iraq when appropriately aged citizens have been fleeing the violence.

He mentioned he would fight, and anticipate his sons to take up arms, if Australia came beneath attack.

“What I have noticed, as have several of my constituents, is that a huge quantity of the refugees fleeing Syria, Iraq and other war-torn nations seem to be predominantly males amongst 18 and 45,” he said.

“Why are they not staying and instruction to defend their land, their way of life and their rights?… It is a bit rich to expect other folks from foreign countries to lay down their lives for you if you are not prepared to stand and fight.”

Mr Baldwin spoke in support of the Government’s legislation to strip dual nationals of their Australian citizenship if convicted of a terror offence.

“If you do not like Australia and all it has to provide, then do not come, do not keep, go back to where you came from,” he stated.

Mr Baldwin stated he was proud to speak on the bill, stating there was “no room in the globe for Daesh [another name for Islamic State] death cults”.

The bill passed the Reduced Home overnight and is scheduled for debate in the Senate this evening.

Mr Baldwin also expressed concerns more than the vetting of refugees, which Immigration Minister Peter Dutton addressed in Parliament yesterday.

Mr Dutton stated that the 12,000 Syrian and Iraqi refugees to be resettled in Australia would be topic to “the most rigorous criteria”.

“We are applying biometric and fingerprint testing,” he stated.

“We can be assured that people who are applying below that plan are indeed those who are most in need to have.

“If we discover an applicant where we have a suspicion about the person’s motivation or background or affiliations, that particular person will not proceed into this plan, they will not be coming to this nation.”

Topics: federal-parliament, refugees, australia, syrian-arab-republic, iraq

Agen Sabung Ayam

Physique of Russian pilot killed in Syria to be returned: Turkish PM

Updated November 29, 2015 23:12:49

The body of a Russian pilot killed when his plane was shot down by Turkey last week will be handed over to a Russian representative soon after becoming retrieved from Syria, Turkish prime minister Ahmet Davutoglu says.

“The pilot who lost his life for the duration of the air violation was received by us on the [Syrian] border last evening,” Mr Davutoglu told reporters in Istanbul, prior to leaving for a meeting with EU leaders in Brussels.

Mr Davutoglu added a Russian official would travel to the southern Hatay area with a Turkish military official soon to claim the body.

The Russian embassy in Turkey told the Russian RIA Novosti news agency that Oleg Peskov’s physique would be flown on Sunday from Hatay in the presence of Russia’s military, attached to an aerodrome in Ankara, exactly where it would be met by the ambassador.

The date and time when the physique would be returned to Russia was still to be confirmed, embassy spokesman Igor Mityakov said.

The man was shot dead in Syria soon after parachuting from the burning aircraft, whilst a second man was discovered protected.

“In accordance with their [Russian] religious tradition, funeral arrangements had been carried out by Orthodox priests in Hatay,” Mr Davutoglu mentioned.

Turkey’s military mentioned the Su-24 bomber was shot down by two of its F-16s after it violated Turkish airspace ten instances inside a five-minute period on Tuesday.

Russia, however, said no warning had been provided and that the aircraft did not violate Turkish airspace, and demanded an apology.

The incident has led to a sharp deterioration of relations, with Moscow, a main trade partner and Turkey’s largest power supplier, on Saturday announcing a package of economic sanctions against Turkey.

“Turkey’s relations with Russia is based on mutual advantage and typical interests. As a result, I urge the Russian authorities to take this into consideration and act in a cool-headed way,” Mr Davutoglu mentioned when asked about the sanctions.

Russian plane violated Israeli-controlled airspace: defence minister

A Russian warplane not too long ago entered Israeli-controlled airspace from Syria, but the intrusion was resolved without incident, Israeli defence minister Moshe Yaalon said on Sunday.

“There was a slight intrusion a mile [1.6 kilometres] deep by a Russian plane from Syria into our airspace, but it was quickly resolved and the Russian plane returned towards Syria,” Mr Yaalon told public radio.

Russian jet shot down by Turkey Photo: Turkey says it issued repeated warnings to a Russian jet it claimed violated its airspace. (Anadolu)

“It was apparently an error by the pilot who was flying close to the Golan.”

Israel seized most of the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967 and later annexed the territory in a move never recognised by the international community.

Mr Yaalon mentioned Israel and Russia had produced arrangements to steer clear of clashes more than Syria, with the agreement mentioned to contain a “hotline” and data sharing.

“Russian planes do not intend to attack us, which is why we need to not automatically react and shoot them down when an error happens,” he stated.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian president Vladimir Putin held talks in Moscow in September to talk about ways of avoiding accidental clashes.

Russia launched a bombing campaign in Syria on September 30 at the request of its longstanding ally Bashar al-Assad, which Moscow says is targeting Islamic State jihadists and other “terrorist” groups.


Subjects: unrest-conflict-and-war, defence-and-national-safety, air-force, air-and-space, turkey, syrian-arab-republic, russian-federation

Initial posted November 29, 2015 23:11:00

Sabung Ayam On the internet

Cameron makes case for Britain to join Syria air strikes

Posted November 27, 2015 00:45:06

British prime minister David Cameron has argued his case for the UK to join air strikes in Syria ahead of a vote expected at a later date, with signs of opposition weakening following the Paris attacks.

“If we won’t act now, when our buddy and ally France has been struck in this way, then our friends and allies can be forgiven for asking: If not now, when?” Mr Cameron asked parliament.

Mr Cameron argued there was a legal basis for intervention for self-defence due to the fact of the threat posed by Islamic State jihadists at residence, and mentioned Britain must not “sub-contract” its safety to allies.

“We have to deny a secure haven for ISIL in Syria. The longer ISIL is allowed to grow in Syria, the higher the threat it will pose,” he stated in a written statement on the concern, employing yet another acronym for IS.

Mr Cameron called for “patience and persistence” and outlined a seven-point method for Syria, like diplomatic and humanitarian efforts and preparing for what will happen if president Bashar al-Assad falls.

Mr Cameron is expected to call a vote in parliament on the concern just before recess starts on December 17.

This would come two years right after a preceding vote for military action in Syria failed soon after the primary opposition Labour Celebration voted against.

Mr Cameron has stepped up stress on MPs to vote for strikes following IS claimed responsibility for the November 13 attacks in Paris, which killed 130 people.

“The events in Paris have clearly changed items,” Malcolm Chalmers, investigation director at the Royal United Solutions Institute (RUSI), told AFP.

“I think the mood in parliament has changed,” he stated, predicting that the vote will pass given that “a considerable quantity of MPs” had changed their minds.

“There’s scepticism on each sides of the Homes but I consider opinions are starting to modify,” he said.

But Mr Chalmers also said there was still a “shadow” from Britain’s participation in the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the NATO bombing campaign in Libya in 2011 which helped topple dictator Moamar Gaddafi but was followed by bitter civil war.

Joining Syrian air strikes could pose a danger to Britain

Critics have argued that joining the campaign could enhance the threat of Britain becoming a target.

“As long as we intervene in the Middle East, we must expect atrocities in return. Bombing will not cease them,” columnist Simon Jenkins wrote in the Evening Common this week.

But Mr Cameron on Thursday argued that Britain was already a target, pointing to the killings of 30 British vacationers by an IS gunman in a Tunisian resort in June in which a total of 38 folks had been killed.

He also stated that Britain was currently assisting in the air campaign on Syria with surveillance.

Whilst British forces are taking part in air strikes on IS targets in Iraq, they are not involved in the US-led coalition targeting Syria due to resistance from opposition parties nonetheless mindful of earlier unpopular interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Labour’s anti-war leader Jeremy Corbyn is against any military action but Mr Cameron appears increasingly confident he can get enough support from Labour MPs to pass the vote, specifically after last week’s UN Safety Council resolution authorising nations to “take all essential measures” against IS.

A Instances/YouGov opinion poll final week discovered that 58 per cent of men and women would approve of Britain joining air strikes in Syria, compared to 22 per cent against.

Reports suggest the government could contact a vote on the problem subsequent week.

On Monday, Mr Cameron stated the vote could come “in the coming days and weeks”.


Topics: government-and-politics, unrest-conflict-and-war, neighborhood-and-society, united-kingdom, syrian-arab-republic

Agen Sabung Ayam

Downing of Russian jet shows ‘incredibly volatile situation’ in Syria

Updated November 25, 2015 15:24:07

Tensions in between Russia and Turkey are intensifying following Turkish fighter jets shot down a Russian warplane near the Turkish-Syrian border.

Turkey has told the United Nations the warplane violated its air space close to the border area, but Russia has denied that the plane had crossed into Turkish skies.

Russian president Vladimir Putin described the downing of its jet as a “stab in the back” committed by “accomplices of terrorists”.

The ABC’s Middle East correspondent Matt Brown, who is in Syria near the Turkish-Syrian border, appears at the important aspects of the incident.

How could some thing like this have happened?

This is just an additional instance of the extremely volatile scenario the Syrian civil war has thrown up.

You have got Turkey backing the rebel groups and having named for the downfall of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

You’ve got Russia in there, bombing all manner of rebel groups. It claims to be focusing on the Islamic State (IS) group but there is constant proof that it is not.

Moscow has been bombing a Turkmen rebel group in the far north-west of Syria, right up near the Turkish border.

In the airspace above Syria, you have got the US-led coalition, such as Australia, bombing targets. You have got the Russians and sometimes you have got the Israelis.

More than the past two days, I’ve been searching up at the sky and seeing the inform-tale contrails of fighter bombers wheeling around in the skies above Hasakah, which is up along the other finish of the Turkish border.

So extremely busy in the skies, quite volatile on the ground, and very volatile between key regional powers.

Is the fate of the pilots still unknown?

There was an early report quoting the Turkmen rebel group in that location exactly where the pilots came down, saying that each Russian pilots have been killed.

They ejected from their aircraft when it was hit.

There is extraordinary footage of it flaming down to the ground.

The rebels claimed they shot the pilots and published a video purportedly showing one particular of them.

But Turkey said the two pilots survived and that they were negotiating for their release.

What are the wider consequences of this?

We’re hearing from Washington that this won’t alter the American bombing campaign targeting IS.

But men and women on the ground right here who have been fighting IS say they are worried that all this tension will somehow disrupt the air campaign.

The air campaign has been vital to hitting every little thing from command posts to suicide car bombers on their way to hit Kurdish militia lines, the folks who are fighting the Islamist jihadists.

So there is some concern there, despite what Washington says.

But along the whole stretch of the Syrian-Turkish border, everyone for a extended time has been aware of the possibilities that planes could be brought down since one was brought down early on in the conflict.

And we’re now hearing from a US-armed rebel group that they shot at a Russian helicopter, forced it to land in Syrian government-controlled territory.

So what has long been a proxy war is piece by piece, step by step, becoming an all out conflict in between major parties, and that is very, really harmful.

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, defence-forces, world-politics, turkey, syrian-arab-republic, russian-federation

1st posted November 25, 2015 15:19:43

Agen Sabung Ayam